TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:42:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Alan et al,
>
> I would like to thank all those who responded to my original
> posting asking  for information and suggestions regarding the
> use of Ada vs Java as an initial teaching language -- most useful.

Glad it helped!
>
> It looks as if we will continue using Ada for all our initial
> programming courses for at least another year although I expect the
> issue to resurface before too long!

Nixon's Secretary of State, George Shultz, was fond of saying about
Washington, "Nothing here is ever _over_!" I think the same can be
said about language wars.

> However the introduction of a
> second year course in Java (plus the existing one in C++) may help
> stem the tide.

I think this has worked at GW; we will see over the next few years
as our Java sequence kicks in. We are going to be covering C++ at
the end of the curriculum, after 2 semester courses in Ada, 2 in Java,
and 2 that use "plain C" (compilers and OS), where C will be viewed
as a kind of Java--. C++ can then be seen as (Java--)++. :-)

> Thanks
> Alan
>
Good luck!

Mike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2