TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Nov 1996 15:32:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
>
> How can it possibly be that for something as important as software,
> and for languages that are a decade old, there is 'inadequate data'
> to support a language decision, and if the data is in fact
> inadequate, how can it be that it's not worth spending any time or
> money getting some data?  Or, if it's another case of "make the
> decision, then do the staff work", what does it say that nobody
> even bothers to pretend to justify the decision. :(
>
Let me guess how Ralph Crafts, the ex-fighter jockey, would reply:

"Ready; fire; aim."

Right, Ralph? :-)

Mike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2