Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2000 22:49:32 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It's funny that this discussion has calmed down at least once, almost
to the point of stopping, before it flared up again.
====================================
Richard Conn, Principal Investigator
Reuse Tapestry
-----Original Message-----
From: Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Craig Spannring
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 8:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Can we stop this %$#@ thread? was Re: Standards
This thread not only left Ada a long time ago, the undercurrent left
the subject line a long time ago as well. The point being argued
isn't standards, it's whether Microsoft is a saint or a devil.
We have one side arguing the Microsoft is the greatest thing that ever
hit the software industry, the other arguing that the first side
doesn't know what they're talking about.
I think at least one of the sides needs to remeber the old saying,
"Never argue with a fool, a passer-by might not be able to tell the
difference."
--
=======================================================================
Life is short. | Craig Spannring
Bike hard, ski fast. | [log in to unmask]
--------------------------------+------------------------------------
When all you've got is Perl, everything feels like a smashed thumb
=======================================================================
|
|
|