TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Moran <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tom Moran <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Jul 2000 13:05:00 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Let's focus for a moment on the consumers, rather than the producers,
of "standards".  A standard has value to them to the extent that it
helps them create lasting value.  That implies it must be complete,
available, at a reasonable cost, and last for a reasonable length of
time.  If a "standard" is secret, or costly to find out, it's much
less valuable to standards consumers.  If it has great holes that cost
those consumers a lot to fill in, or where they make (different)
guesses, it loses value.  Every time the "standard" changes, the
"standards consumers" must do a lot of expensive work to upgrade their
products.  A "standard" defined, and modified, by your competitor
based on *his* economic interest, is likely to be much less desirable
than one modified only by consensus of its consumers.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2