TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:34:20 -0500
Reply-To: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (11 lines)
> [Can't prove] that Ada will save money in the long run. Those
> numbers exist for Ada83 in some cases, the Verdix paper is excellent. Ada95
> doesn't have that paper trail yet, ....

Well, if you can "prove" that Ada 83 costs less, and you can "prove"
that Ada 95 is better, the syllogism is pretty simple.  :-)

Java is how old?  Three years? Five?  And the holes in the hype are
already forming.  Ada's complaints are mostly ignorant innuendos, and
she's almost past her teens.