TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:34:20 -0500
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
> [Can't prove] that Ada will save money in the long run. Those
> numbers exist for Ada83 in some cases, the Verdix paper is excellent. Ada95
> doesn't have that paper trail yet, ....

Well, if you can "prove" that Ada 83 costs less, and you can "prove"
that Ada 95 is better, the syllogism is pretty simple.  :-)

Java is how old?  Three years? Five?  And the holes in the hype are
already forming.  Ada's complaints are mostly ignorant innuendos, and
she's almost past her teens.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2