TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:31:04 -0400
Reply-To: Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
From: Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "Stephane Richard" at Jun 13, 2001 09:23:04 PM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (36 lines)
Stephane et al,

See

http://cui.unige.ch/db-research/Enseignement/analyseinfo/Ada95/BNFindex.html

for a nice text and graphic rendering of Ada 95 BNF.

They don't have an Ada 83 one there, but syntax-wise there are few
differences. General access types, protected types, and tagged types
are the ones that come to mind. The syntactic leap is _much_ smaller
than from C to C++, for example.

Mike Feldman
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Could I please be pointer to a website and/or a good PDF file that explains
> in details the Ada 83 and 95 Grammar in B.N.F. format?
>
> I prefere Ada 95, but if there is only Ada 83 B.N.F. Existing out there, so
> be it.
>
> Thank you everyone
>
> Stephane Richard
> Software Developer
>
> --
> Stephane Richard
> Software Developer
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2