TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Bartolini, Antony (ABARTOLI)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bartolini, Antony (ABARTOLI)
Date:
Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:05:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
I thought RTLinux's approach fixed the standard Linux
kernel weaknesses by treating it as a low priority task
running ontop of a hard real-time kernel. Or is there
something else going on?

--
Tony Bartolini
ARINC Incorporated


-----Original Message-----
From: W. Wesley Groleau x4923 [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 2:36 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Ada RTOS.


> Linux is not a real-time OS and ....
>
> Another problem area ... tasking implementation. ....
>
> The other drawback ...time to evaluate the scheduling database ....

OK, so Linux has problems, that's no surprise.  But it's overall a good
system, and competing with it would be a huge challenge.

What if someone (yeah, I know, I should do it myself) were to fix a
problem by replacing a _piece_ of Linux with a much superior equivalent
written in Ada?

--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau

ATOM RSS1 RSS2