TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Terry Westley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Jul 1998 11:40:09 -0400
Organization:
Calspan, an operation of Veridian
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On Tuesday, July 21, 1998 2:30 AM, Erik Margraf [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] wrote:
> [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> > >I think Ada should have something like this, may be we can choose a
> > >different tag than "@", but the IDEA of javadoc is good, you can argue
> > >on implementation.
> >
> > it would be best if we could have a meta language/registry for languages
> > embedded in comments, so that we don't have clashes b/w various options.
> > E.g. do you know what the lead in characters for an ANNA annotation are?
> >
> > Dale
>
> They were:  --|

I believe this is based on an IEEE spec.  Anyone familiar with it?
Can't find my own notes on it.

--
Terry J. Westley, Principal Engineer
Calspan, An operation of Veridian
P.O. Box 400, Buffalo, NY 14225
[log in to unmask]    http://www.calspan.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2