TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: Toshitaka Kumano <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:36:48 +0100
Reply-To: Martin Dowie <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
From: Martin Dowie <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (19 lines)
> I need some powerful advocacy among U.S. defense developers that
> "Ada will Survive", even if it (she?) may be not of mainstream of future
> information systems.
>
> Any URL to *recently* published report or articles are welcome,
> but forecast articles from Navy or DoD officials, or articles for some
> long life-cycle defense system with Ada, would be most powerful
> for persuation.

The first two systems listed in "Crosstalk" (AFATDS and DMLSS) are
both Ada projects with a long term future. They were 2 of the "U.S.
Government's Top 5 Quality Software Projects".

http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/2004/07/index.html

Hope this helps

-- Martin

ATOM RSS1 RSS2