TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Bob Collins <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:36:00 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Reply-To: Bob Collins <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (19 lines)
On 6/21/99 11:46 AM, W. Wesley Groleau x4923 wrote:

>Nor is it true (as they try to mislead us to think) that the Java
>_language_ is somehow needed to get the benefits of J-Code.  Not only are
>there at least two Ada to J-Code compilers, but there are ways to generate
>J-Code from Cobol, C++, Eiffel, Smalltalk, BASIC, and a host of others.  I
>forget the URL and NT problems prevent me calling up Netscape right now,
>but do a Web search for the page titles "Languages for the Java Virtual
>Machine."

"Languages for the Java VM"
<http://grunge.cs.tu-berlin.de/~tolk/vmlanguages.html>

"The following is a list of programming languages for the Java
 virtual machine aside of Java itself. Currently (Dec 1997),
 it comprises about 60 different systems."

                                    Bob Collins

ATOM RSS1 RSS2