TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Nov 1998 14:46:05 -0500
X-To:
Reply-To:
Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
As part of the ARA initiative, I am pushing the general format:

          When [blah blah blah]...
               Choose Ada:
     The Most Trusted Name In Software(TM)

For example:

      When there is no room for error...
               Choose Ada:
     The Most Trusted Name In Software(TM)

      When your software has to fly...
               Choose Ada:
     The Most Trusted Name In Software(TM)

etc...

This highlights the point that software engineers/managers have the ability
(and a duty) to make a choice, not just follow the latest hype,
and that Ada is *already* the most trusted name in software -- it has
a track record.

-Tucker Taft  [log in to unmask]
Intermetrics, Inc.
An AverStar Company

And also: President, Ada Resources Association

ATOM RSS1 RSS2