TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 9 Jun 1999 00:14:40 -0500
text/plain (22 lines)
> >     I'll second Vic on this.  My experience with converting from VADS to
> > GNAT has been that the ONLY noticible cost is the restesting.  Even on
> > fairly large software suites, the time to get recompiled and up and running
> > is less than it takes to talk about it.

Third.

I have spent less then 45 hours porting 17,000 files from Apex to GNAT.  Only
two (maybe three) significant* compiler bugs found in that time, and these
affected less than 30 files.  One of these bugs bit about fifteen files,
but for all of them, a slight restructuring of the code was enough to
compile.

A good portion of those hours was spent repeating things because I didn't
have the disk space to do it right the first time.  :-)

* "significant" meaning the bug took more than a couple of days for ACT to
fix it.

Now it didn't take 45 hours to talk about that, but we'll tolerate a little
exaggeration.  :-)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2