TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 12:10:59 -0400
Reply-To: Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
From: Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> from "Brashear, Phil" at Apr 06, 2000 12:00:38 PM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (16 lines)
Phil et al,
>
> Since Java compilers are not subject to third-party testing, one wonders how
> the COE folks know that Java-to-JBC compilers don't "inadvertently bypass
> intended Java security features."
>
> Philip W. Brashear

Well, EVERYONE knows that only Ada compilers have to justify their
existence and correctness. Java and C++ compilers are ipso facto
OK, even for the DoD, just 'cause their vendors say so. :-)

Sorry for the cynicism...

Mike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2