TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Thu, 6 Apr 2000 12:10:59 -0400
Reply-To:
Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]> from "Brashear, Phil" at Apr 06, 2000 12:00:38 PM
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Phil et al,
>
> Since Java compilers are not subject to third-party testing, one wonders how
> the COE folks know that Java-to-JBC compilers don't "inadvertently bypass
> intended Java security features."
>
> Philip W. Brashear

Well, EVERYONE knows that only Ada compilers have to justify their
existence and correctness. Java and C++ compilers are ipso facto
OK, even for the DoD, just 'cause their vendors say so. :-)

Sorry for the cynicism...

Mike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2