TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:01:36 -0500
Reply-To: Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
From: Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> from "Alexandre E. Kopilovitch" at Dec 06, 2002 02:01:46 AM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (25 lines)
[said Alex]
>
> >The dichotomy between CS and SE, at the UG (as opposed
> >to research) level is entirely artificial,
> That is probably true, but one trouble still exists (and it is significant even
> at the UG level): what is called Computer Science isn't a science at all, it
> is more or less organized collection of facts (from several true sciences),
> which are more or less related to and adapted to sotfware engineering techniques.

Yes, I agree. My point is that the names are really quite arbitrary,
so we ought to quit arguing over them and focus on what is *done*,
rather than what we call it.

My favorite name is the made-up one that ws invented in Europe
but never caught on, "Informatics". It's just as arbitrary, but
at least it focus on information, which is, indeed, a lot of what
we do.

>   Well, there is Electrical Engineering, but no Electricity Science.

Well, there's Electricity & Magnetism, which is (generally)
taught (in the US, anyway) as part of physics, or E.E., or both.

Mike Feldman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2