TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Colin Paul Gloster <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:00:34 +0100
TEXT/PLAIN (15 lines)
In an email timestamped Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:35:55 -0000, a member of the 
Association for C & C++ Users (A.C.C.U.) posted to the general email 
list of the A.C.C.U.:

"[..]

> Would it cover dangerous aspects of C++ and why they should not be 
> used in certain applications? Eg real-time, safety critical  etc

Can't see why it should. It's supposed to be C++ certification.
It could well include knowledge of how to write robust C++ code.
Do people write safety critical applications in C++? The thought shocks me.

[..]"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2