TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Hal Hart (Hal Hart)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 May 1997 01:43:51 -0700
X-cc:
X-To:
Drew Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
 DREW:  What is the impact or authority of Mr. Paige's April 29
memorandum (announcing Software Engineering Reviews, dropping of
the language requirement, etc.) relative to DoDD's 3405.1 & -.2
(which I assume will still take many months to revise, coordinate,
& sign out)?

Does the memorandum actually have the immediate official policy effect
the same as revising the Directive(s)?  Or what?

Thanks for giving us an official interpretation,                -- Hal

ATOM RSS1 RSS2