TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Robert I. Eachus" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Robert I. Eachus
Date:
Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:27:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
At 04:13 PM 4/17/98 -0400, Michael Feldman wrote:
>Promise? :-)

  No.  Why?  Because I am in a position where sometimes I have to say
mandate and make it stick. ;-)  Fortunately we are now getting to where the
contractors are insisting on Ada, in spite of those Project Managers at the
SPO who know that using C is in their personal best interest.

  There is still a mandate in the DoD to use the best language for the job.
 The wording may be different from the original Ada mandate, but the effect
is the same.

  My favorite case study on this was a program to update the computers for
a radar system.  The SPO originally wanted an Ada waiver because it would
cost $17 million more to write the code in Ada.  This was blown out of the
water when the contractor studied the issue and reduced their bid by almost
exactly the same amount--if they could use Ada.  (The project finished
basically within time and budget.  The software development was under on both.)

                                        Robert I. Eachus

with Standard_Disclaimer;
use  Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2