TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pascal Obry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pascal Obry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Aug 2003 09:25:36 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Stephen,

 > Ada is a "tool for the next century"; let's not carry the "support
 > legacy stuff" too far. There's no excuse for a line length limit of
 > less than 120.

Well I must disagree here :) I find it just harder to read Ada code with too
long line length. I use a limit of 80. This works well if you want to print
the code (it is true that I use less printed code these days as screen quality
- especially notebooks ones - are really good) or if you want to have a diff
output side-by-side on two different Window.

So I still think that a limit of 80 is good for any languages. This is the way
GNAT, GCC, GDB, Emacs, GPS, AWS... are coded just to name few!

Pascal.

--

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|         http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595

ATOM RSS1 RSS2