TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 11:58:58 -0500
Reply-To: Samuel Mize <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> from "Tucker Taft" at Oct 20, 98 12:57:12 pm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Samuel Mize <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (25 lines)
Tucker Taft wrote:
> I agree with the recommendation to first just recompile, and then
> think about taking advantage of new features where most useful.
> -Tucker Taft  [log in to unmask]

Generally good advice, but I think it misses the thrust of his
question.  They currently have:

  - Ada 83
  - interface control tool

He's wanting to know, if they move to Ada 95, if they will be
able to replace the interface control tool with in-language
features (by doing some reworking of the package hierarchy).

Sure, the first step would be to just port the sources.

I don't know the answer, but it seems a reasonable question.

Best,
Sam Mize
--
Samuel Mize -- [log in to unmask] (home email) -- Team Ada
Fight Spam: see http://www.cauce.org/ \\\ Smert Spamonam

ATOM RSS1 RSS2