TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Philip Brashear <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Philip Brashear <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Apr 1997 11:06:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Ed,
There are some problems with the ACES, most of which are the all-too-common
software errors that can be worked around.  One can certainly argue that
there are problems with the general testing scheme and it's validity, but
I still believe that it gives you the best "artificial" performance profile
that you can get.  It's certainly no worse than the (obsoloscent) PIWG set,
and arguably far better.

(I note that your return address specifies "rivendell".  In the same context,
my laptop is named "Galadriel".)

Phil

ATOM RSS1 RSS2