TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 20:08:54 -0500
Reply-To: Randy Brukardt <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: common pattern versus an Ada limitation
From: Randy Brukardt <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To: <01C1FDDC.8A9A8760@IGNITOR>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (11 lines) 
> 2) Language Revision
> --------------------
> This issue naturally leads to the question: can the next language
> revision for Ada provide the missing guarantee, assuring a match
> in comparisons of subprogram access values that designate the same
> subprogram?

No. Over my dead body.

                        Randy Brukardt.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2