TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 May 2002 20:08:54 -0500
Reply-To:
Randy Brukardt <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
Randy Brukardt <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
In-Reply-To:
<01C1FDDC.8A9A8760@IGNITOR>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
> 2) Language Revision
> --------------------
> This issue naturally leads to the question: can the next language
> revision for Ada provide the missing guarantee, assuring a match
> in comparisons of subprogram access values that designate the same
> subprogram?

No. Over my dead body.

                        Randy Brukardt.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2