TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Roger Racine <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Apr 1999 10:11:09 -0400
In-Reply-To:
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Roger Racine <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
At 07:50 AM 4/7/1999 , Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
>Roger:
>
>> I was rather shocked to learn that the Navy (at least for one program) is
>> requiring that all software -not- be written in Ada.  I asked if that
>> included COTS, and, at least from a second-hand source, the answer was
"yes".
>
>Are you sure the real reason is that they need data to prove
>that a pure Ada project is cheaper than a non-Ada project?
>

Quite sure.  I was told that none of the software could be written in Ada,
even if it came as part of a COTS product.  I believe at least part of the
reason is that this manager thinks that Ada-knowledgeable people are too
scarce to be able to maintain the system for a reasonable cost.

Roger Racine

ATOM RSS1 RSS2