TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: "McDonough, Daniel Mr HQ/SAN" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 10:33:56 -0800
Reply-To: AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
From: AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: TEXT/PLAIN (26 lines)
At the end of a two month class (two nights per week, and two
Saturdays) in Ada, one of my more argumentive students approached
me with his view of Ada.  He said, "I think I am beginning to see
the point. With C I can get a clean compile on my program immediately,
but it takes me a long time to get it to run.  With Ada it takes a long
time to get a clean compile, but once it compiles there is less work
required to make it run."

This seems to be true of the C family of languages, including C++. Those
members of your team who are fustrated with the effort in getting a clean
compilation are stuck with the same short-sighted view that is the bane of
American industry.

I sometimes wonder if these same people think 30 minute sitcoms
represent a true fragment of how real-life works.

Richard Riehle

[log in to unmask]
AdaWorks Software Engineering
Suite 30
2555 Park Boulevard
Palo Alto, CA 94306
(415) 328-1815
FAX  328-1112