TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"McDonough, Daniel Mr HQ/SAN" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Mar 1997 10:33:56 -0800
Reply-To:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (26 lines)
At the end of a two month class (two nights per week, and two
Saturdays) in Ada, one of my more argumentive students approached
me with his view of Ada.  He said, "I think I am beginning to see
the point. With C I can get a clean compile on my program immediately,
but it takes me a long time to get it to run.  With Ada it takes a long
time to get a clean compile, but once it compiles there is less work
required to make it run."

This seems to be true of the C family of languages, including C++. Those
members of your team who are fustrated with the effort in getting a clean
compilation are stuck with the same short-sighted view that is the bane of
American industry.

I sometimes wonder if these same people think 30 minute sitcoms
represent a true fragment of how real-life works.

Richard Riehle

[log in to unmask]
AdaWorks Software Engineering
Suite 30
2555 Park Boulevard
Palo Alto, CA 94306
(415) 328-1815
FAX  328-1112

ATOM RSS1 RSS2