TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dave Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 19:05:08 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
on 2/8/01 7:44 PM, S. Ron Oliver at [log in to unmask] wrote:

> I felt it was time to open up a new topic.  Bob Leif, as usual, "gets one
> going".  :)
>
>> From: Bob Leif
>> To: Ron Oliver et al.
>> The real question is what can be done to fix the process of selecting
>> software development tools? C++ and Java are only illustrations of the
>> problem. The long term solution is NOT to sell Ada; it is to sell
>> statistical process control, which in turn will sell Ada.
>
> I'm sure most or all of us agree.
>
>> Engineering executives are supposed to make decisions on facts --not hype.
>
> Now I know you are dreaming!!  "Engineering executives" can only make
> decisions on the basis of what their "engineering EXPERTS" tell them.  The
> problem is to get these EXPERTS to do their job.  That is quite a different
> matter.
>

In my experience, the EXPERTS are those that need coverage and don't have to
live with their expert advice.

dave

ATOM RSS1 RSS2