TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 11:29:43 EST
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>; from "Ralph E. Crafts" at Nov 8, 96 10:58 am
Reply-To: "W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (20 lines)
:> I have read the report, attended the public briefing, and I have a copy
:> of the slides.  My original comments were based on all the above.

It was apparent that your comments (very well-written, I might add) were
based on "the real thing"

Others however, quoted and then attacked the summary, which came to Team-Ada
from someone, who got it from someone, who got it from ...

I'm not trying to defend the report, nor attack those who attack it.
I was merely honestly wondering when I said:
> How accurately does the summary reflect the full report?
> Did the summary come from the study group or from a reader of the report?

W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)                                Office: 219-429-4923
Hughes Defense Communications (MS 10-40)                 Home: 219-471-7206
Fort Wayne,  IN   46808                  (Unix): [log in to unmask]