TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 15:02:38 -0500
Reply-To: Stanley Allen <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Stanley Allen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (23 lines)
Matthew S. Whiting wrote:
>
> It seems a little melodramatic to me to consider a flight SIMULATOR to
> be a safety critical application.  Now a flight CONTROL system in a real
> airplane is another matter...
>

If you are thinking along the lines of "Microsoft Flight Simulator",
you are correct.  However, many simulation facilities for pilot
*certification* training involve a lot of large moving parts.  These
are the "motion-based" training simulators which often have a cockpit
elevated using hydraulic stilts and which allow multiple degrees of
motion.  In addition to simple take-off and landing motions (BTW,
I say "simple" knowing that the safety aspects of these activities
are not trivial), such a training device may often be programmable
via instructor inputs to simulate motion resulting from strong winds,
ascents and descents, and "battle" action.  For these kinds of
simulators, life- or limb-threatening hazards are not unknown.

--
Stanley Allen
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2