TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:14:43 -0500
X-To:
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
> The presentation with the most "hard" data I have seen is:
>
>    http://www.adaic.com/docs/present/ajpo/pll-cost/html/

The second paragraph of the script asks, "Have you ever heard ... 'Let's
use C/C++ ... less costly and less error-prone than Ada.' ?"

I realize that many people believe the myth that Ada is expensive.  But
is there anyone out there so ignorant as to believe Ada is error-prone?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2