TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:31:28 +0900
Reply-To: Toshitaka KUMANO <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Organization: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
From: Toshitaka KUMANO <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (19 lines)
Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
> That's better, but still not equivalent if the computations of Left and Right are function calls with side-effects (they are
> computed more than once). Have another try!

I see the possibility. Thank you.

 # I must latch the results of Left and Right because the iteration
 # condition should be evaluated only once when for-loop.

My topic here is, however, to know what Ada programmers and language
lawyers would think "For-Loop Iteration for Real Type" for AdaXX.

Could you comment on that ?

   Toshitaka KUMANO <[log in to unmask]>