TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Toshitaka KUMANO <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Toshitaka KUMANO <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:31:28 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
> That's better, but still not equivalent if the computations of Left and Right are function calls with side-effects (they are
> computed more than once). Have another try!

I see the possibility. Thank you.

 # I must latch the results of Left and Right because the iteration
 # condition should be evaluated only once when for-loop.

My topic here is, however, to know what Ada programmers and language
lawyers would think "For-Loop Iteration for Real Type" for AdaXX.

Could you comment on that ?

Regards,
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Toshitaka KUMANO <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2