TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Ada 0X (Was: C date package)
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 15:18:54 +0200
In-Reply-To: <"B661ZYLIGBDLI*/R=FBDCVD/R=A1/U=MCCABE JOHN/"@MHS>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Jacob Sparre Andersen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: TEXT/PLAIN (16 lines) 
John McCabe wrote:

> So to me it sounds like a possible problem, but only in
> certain circumstances.  Besides - this will probably be
> updated in Ada 0x!

Which reminds me: Shouldn't ISO standards be reviewed every
five years?

I presume that the conclusion will be "wait another five
years", but I would like to know it.

Jacob
--
"Sleep is just a cheap substitute for coffee"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2