TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: ljknews <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 07:50:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To: ljknews <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (13 lines)
At 12:10 PM +0100 9/18/04, Simon Wright wrote:

>It's certainly true that the (apparent) ease of task programming in
>Ada can lead new users to think that they can use tasks without
>considering the resource usage. If you had 1000 radar tracks, it might
>be unwise to assign a task to each one; at the very least, you'd want
>to measure the performance in the prototype phase.

There ain't no such thing as a free lunch, and those who believe
otherwise are bound for a life of disappointment.
--
Larry Kilgallen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2