Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 1997 11:12:00 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
TEXT/PLAIN |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I must apologize to Mike Berman of Manugistics who is the volunteer
watching over the dialog level on TEAM-ADA; he was put out that I accused
him of being a politically correct academic. Mike has recently corrected
my false impression.
Nonetheless, I still stand by the essence of my earlier remark -- bread
and butter issues should be a main course on TEAM-ADA: software process
management (P-CMM, Sfw-CMM, SA-CMM, ISO), economics, markets,
opportunities, p.r., and politics as related to Ada developers
(individual, corporate, government). I agree that putting verbose detail
on the WWWeb is good -- but I still believe that short notes of hot items
or changed desriptives do belong on Email.
The community response to Secretary Paige's about-face was not bad. A
better dialog is what long range goals are needed for Ada-2007. (More on
that later.)
Mike Berens
|
|
|