Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 May 1997 14:20:45 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-cc: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hal and others, I would invite all interested parties to read the policy
memorandum on the Ada IC web site.
http://www.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/pol-hist
As for the impact of the memo relative to DoDD 3405.1&2 I really would
rather have that answered by a policy expert from OSD. Since you asked
me for an official interpretation of policy I am referring it to Ms.
Linda Brown, who is Mr. Paige's designated expert in this area.
Regards
Drew
**********************************
John A. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
Lieutenant Colonel, US Army
Chief, AJPO
**********************************
>----------
>From: Hal Hart[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 1997 4:43 AM
>To: Drew Hamilton
>Cc: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
>[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Weight of April-29 Paige Memo?
>
> DREW: What is the impact or authority of Mr. Paige's April 29
>memorandum (announcing Software Engineering Reviews, dropping of
>the language requirement, etc.) relative to DoDD's 3405.1 & -.2
>(which I assume will still take many months to revise, coordinate,
>& sign out)?
>
>Does the memorandum actually have the immediate official policy effect
>the same as revising the Directive(s)? Or what?
>
>Thanks for giving us an official interpretation, -- Hal
>
|
|
|