TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Oct 1998 13:15:53 -0500
X-To:
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
> I am giving a short lecture ... opinions on
> what is its bad points, or why people aren't using it.

One of the advantages of Java over Ada for my field, IMHO, is that the
customer is more impressed if you say you will use Java.

I still believe that using Ada will reduce costs and defects.  But how can
you prove it unless you do both and measure the results?

And how can you do both if one doesn't win contracts?

At any rate, the gap in costs and defects between Java and Ada is probably
much smaller than the gap between either Java or Ada and C or C++.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2