Mon, 8 Feb 1999 09:16:49 -0600
W. Wesley Groleau x4923 wrote:
> > - if the type is indefinite, you can't declare an object of that
> > type. Of course, the full declaration makes it definite inside
> > the private parts of the package. But you can't have an object
> > of that type outside the package. This may be a problem or a
> > feature, depending on exactly what you're trying to do.
> You may want it in the private part to make it common to all child units.
> But you could just as easily put it in a private child and have the other
> child units with it. But if you can't have an object of that type outside
> the package, is there any point in having the type visible?
Several later messages point out that you can declare one with an
Aside from that, having it visible allows you to use it as a
parameter. So a user program could get an item of this type
from a producer, modify it with procedures or extract data from
it with functions.
Samuel Mize -- [log in to unmask] (home email) -- Team Ada
Fight Spam: see http://www.cauce.org/ \\\ Smert Spamonam