TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:46:34 -0500
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
> I agree in general, but there is one pitfall in the case of OOP (which by
> the way is not unique to Ada).  If you misspell the name of a subprogram
> intended to override an otherwise implicitly inherited operation, then you
> do not override it even  though you think you have.  ....

But this thread started with a question about Ada's advantages and
disadvantages--if any :-) -- compared with other languages.  If they all
have the same problem, it doesn't help Neil's report.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2