TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 May 2000 14:16:12 +1000
Reply-To:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization:
Canon Information Systems Research Australia
From:
Geoff Bull <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Craig Carey wrote:
> At 11:25 04.05.00 -0800, wbiondi <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> |We stopped the voting because the results seemed skewed towards Ada.

Would they have been happy with 98% C, multiple votes or not.


> |According to our research, Ada should come in at
> |around 5-6%, not the 50% the poll was showing.

What research?
If they already know that, why are they doing the poll?
I guess they'll keep doing it until they get the answer they like.
Whatever answer they get on a web page poll is going to be a measure
of something other than language usage.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2