Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jul 2000 07:20:23 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
If Microsoft is interested in standards compliance (their products and
practices certainly don't indicate that), then Visual C++ has got a lot of
changes overdue! It adds to the standard and deviates from the standard in
areas so basic that I have to warn my (second-term) students about the
problems!
Philip W. Brashear
EDS Conformance Testing Center
4646 Needmore Road, Bin 46
P.O. Box 24593
Dayton, OH 45424-0593
(937) 237-4510
[log in to unmask]
http://www.eds-conform.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Conn [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 12:05 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Leveraging MicroSoft's Marketing
Thanks ... that's not so bad, then. You can just use the standard part
if you choose. The way they talked, tho, they kept emphasizing standards
compliance. I guess in their minds "standards compliance" meant that
supersets are OK, while in mine it doesn't. Oh well.
====================================
Richard Conn, Principal Investigator
Reuse Tapestry
-----Original Message-----
From: David Botton [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 11:57 PM
To: Richard Conn; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Leveraging MicroSoft's Marketing
Superset.
David Botton
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Conn" <[log in to unmask]>
> Very interesting ... I missed that. They did not mention that at all at
the
> That's disappointing. Have you used it enough to determine if we are
> looking
> at a superset of the standard or a deviation from the standard.
|
|
|