TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:32:47 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-To: "Deller, Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (12 lines)
> Contrary to what is claimed, at the time malloc and free were NOT thread
> safe.  Nor were they Ada task safe.  In those days there were no real
> threads.

Well, the successful five Mega-SLOC project never traced a problem to
the use of malloc and free.  And it had LOTS of tasking--in fact,
being an early Ada project, there was a heck of a lot of over-use
of Ada features.

Nested generics, multi-discriminant variant records, tasks everywhere, etc.
Any feature unique to Ada just HAD to be used if possible.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2