TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "Bremmon, Chad" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 14:49:05 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: "Bremmon, Chad" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (34 lines)
As team-ada, I think we really need to give Kudos to Michael Barr, who
actually repeatedly asked me to finish my article.  Were it not for his
prodding it wouldn't have gotten done.  (I am Chad after all)  So I don't
think there's a bias against Ada at all.

There's probably a lot of room for follow-up on my article.  It does a
pretty good job at pointing out the good features of Ada95, while not being
too pushy.  I didn't say, "You Idiots" or "Morons" once in the article.

I look forward to ideas about following up the article.  I got confirmation
that it will come out on-or-about 1 October.


Unified Process -- It's all about common sense.

Chad Bremmon   =| : )
Senior Consultant
Armstrong Consulting, Inc.
1050 Cherokee Street, Suite 303
Denver, CO 80204

511 Second Street, Suite 100
Hudson, WI  54016

(715) 386-3666          (800) 575-4160
(715) 386-3665          (612) 282-3199  cell <>
      "enabling high performance e-development"
UML -- Spoken Here