Fri, 20 Nov 1998 08:40:21 -0700
It is when its being redesigned in Ada95 instead of c\c++. A decision
was made to redesign code in Ada95 to get the increased support from
tools and compiler vendors. I think that's a success when a decision
like that is made. They could have just as easily have chosen to
redesign in c\c++.
Perhaps my use of "moved" was not quite accurate, I should have said
redesigned. But in any case the decision to purchase Ada95
tools/training and migrate towards it shows a longer term commitment
than using a 6 year old unsupported Ada83 compiler just because it's
cheaper and still Ada.
From: (No Name Available) [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 6:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Ada market viability
[log in to unmask] (John Apa) quoted and then wrote:
>Boeing Commercial Aircraft Avionics. # 4
>Airbus Commercial Aircraft Avionics. # 5
>Plus Business Class Jet Avionics. # 6
>The above are still Ada83, but I believe that plans are still
>to move them to Ada95.
Moving something that works to Ada95 is not a benefit in and of