TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 May 1999 08:05:04 -0500
X-To:
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
> And how about the underling  operating systems, databases and other COT
> products?   I have seen DOD projects which go to great lengths to use
> "Safety-Critical" subsets of Ada ( Annex H) and then run them on an
> untested operating system.

.....which was written with one of the most error-prone languages ever
invented and built with an unvalidated coompiler.  :-)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2