TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 15:02:24 +1000
Reply-To: Dale Stanbrough <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: "Why Not Ada"
From: Dale Stanbrough <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (9 lines) 
>
>BTW, using page count as a metric, C99 has a bloat factor almost identical
>to that of Ada95.

yes, but doesn't the standard include things that are not included in
the AdaLRM, such as locales?

Dale

ATOM RSS1 RSS2