TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:31:11 +0100
Reply-To: "Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From: C & U Grein <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (7 lines)
Colin Paul Gloster schrieb:
> Can't see why it should. It's supposed to be C++ certification.
> It could well include knowledge of how to write robust C++ code.
> Do people write safety critical applications in C++? The thought shocks me.
I guess they do Modern cars like Mercedes and BMW have a lot of code 
inside - and they don't use Ada AFAIK.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2