TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Chris Sparks (Mr. Ada)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chris Sparks (Mr. Ada)
Date:
Thu, 13 Mar 1997 12:49:56 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
W. Wesley Groleau (Wes) wrote:

> :> You know, the dropped mandate may be beneficial to the Ada community
> :> because Ada will now have to survive on actual merits, instead of
> :> theoretical ones.  A lot of vendors are going to have to get their acts
> :> together in a big way if they're going to make it in an open,
> :> competitive arena.

I think compiler vendors will probably opt for C or C++ instead of Ada.
If a company is devoted to using Ada, like ACT, then a quality product
can
be achieved.  Why would any company try to get their product right when
the market share is low and not enough revenue is generated to keep the
Ada products alive?

At this point in time I have a wait and see attitude.

Oh well....


Chris Sparks

ATOM RSS1 RSS2