TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 13:06:50 -0500
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (8 lines)
How can it possibly be that for something as important as software,
and for languages that are a decade old, there is 'inadequate data'
to support a language decision, and if the data is in fact
inadequate, how can it be that it's not worth spending any time or
money getting some data?  Or, if it's another case of "make the
decision, then do the staff work", what does it say that nobody
even bothers to pretend to justify the decision. :(

ATOM RSS1 RSS2